|
A Teacher Leadership Conversation
Dear
TNLI MetLife Fellows:
Believe it or not, April is right around the corner! As is our
usual process, we are providing you in advance with the national
listserv reading for the month of April to be hosted by the
Miami TNLI affiliate, and moderated by Miami TNLI MetLife Fellow
Mark Rosenkrantz.
Specifically, the topic during the month of April is Teacher
Leadership. Since this topic is indeed so broad and important
(and our namesake!) and since Miami wants to ensure that we
have the most informed and engaging professional discussion
possible this month’s reading is actually a CHOICE of one, two,
or more of a whole series of article links on the subject. Please
find these links below and we look forward to a lively discussion
led by Mark and the crew from Miami-Dade County!
APRIL Miami-Dade County
Moderator: MetLife Fellow Mark Rosenkrantz
A national, collective reading in jigsaw-format from a series
of articles on the topic of Teacher Leadership. Specifically,
in order to provide for the greatest depth and breadth of conversation
on this broad topic, TNLI Fellows will want to choose one, two,
or more articles of greatest interest from the total list provided
below to read and refer to re: this discussion on Teacher Leadership.
http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/results/res4-04rich.cfm
http://www.westedorg/onlinepubs/rd-02-03.pdf
http://annenberginstitute.org/images/InstructionalCoaching.pdf
http://www.teacherleaders.org/misc/reneemoore.pdf
http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/donaldson253.pdf
http://www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/LordMiller.doc
Ellen and Peter
National HQ
3/29/05
|
Greetings.
My name is Mark Rosenkrantz. I am this month's moderator for
the discussion on "Teacher Leadership". I am a NBCT
Elementary Art Teacher in Miami-Dade County, Florida.
Teaching for seven years, I have involved myself in activities
over this period that, in retrospect, required teacher leadership
skills. I placed myself in the role of a teacher leader by leading
group workshops, mentoring NBCT candidates and beginning teachers,
and initiating new programs at my school. Just like many of
you. Yet I pursued these activities in an uncritical way in
regards to what "teacher leader" really means for
me and for my profession. As I selected these articles from
the TNLI reading list I felt the literature was defining a set
of skills, identifying ways for teachers to acquire those skills,
and revealing the role of the
"teacher leader" in today's educational community.
I had never really reflected on my own "teacher leader"
skill set.
What skills do I have that supported my leadership abilities?
When was I effective?
When was I not effective and why?
If I need help in improving my leadership skills, where do I
go? Who do I talk too?
At times I feel my identification in the role of "teacher
leader" was not something I sought out, but a perception
imposed on me by my colleagues based on my activities.
How and why did this come about?
Does the social structure of professional teacher relationships,
with each other, and school administrators, create a need for
"leaders" and "followers" ?
I feel I switch from leader to follower based on the professional
situation. I am not always confident in the leadership role
outside of my classroom. Moderating this discussion is a perfect
example. Unfamiliar with the use of this group site, I sought
out help from my colleagues. I used to feel that seeking out
support was not part of the leadership role. Now I feel that
it is precisely through that search that I make new collaborative
contacts and strengthen my expertise.
Maybe we are all hidden leaders who need venues, such as this
site, to practice our skills.
Do our educational communities provide us with opportunities
for leadership?
Are we supported or undermined when we act as leaders in our
schools?
Along with many of you, I am new to this discussion about teacher
leadership. I hope you find the articles (see below) and my
questions stimulating. By sharing our experience, and our questions,
maybe we can begin to come to terms with this topic.
Mark Rosenkrantz
Miami-Dade County, FL
4/5/05
|
|
I think
that we typically find ourselves in the un-official position
of teacher leader. Many times this is because we see a problem
exist and step up to take a role in finding a solution. I
know for myself that this comes about when other staff are
not doing the job they
should do and it is having a negative effect on my classroom
and my students.
I
do feel lucky, though, because I have a principal who seeks
out teachers to take the lead on projects and ideas. This
is one of her goals and she is successful at it. My only concern
is for those teachers who find themselves in schools where
the building leaders are not keen on the idea of a teacher
being a leader - or worse yet, the other faculty/staff is
not okay with it either. I know that if a teacher in my school
volunteers to do something that isn't required by the contract,
a select few other teachers get upset because they feel
like they are looked at negatively if they don't.
I'd be
interested to hear others' thoughts on finding this balance
on being a teacher leader - how do we lead without the resentment
from others? And, to tie in last month's onversation, do unions
and the contracts foster this kind of leadership?
Tim Fredrick
New York City
4/10/05
|
|
Thank you for your thoughtful response. I
have also observed the situations you have described. I feel
it is a reflection of school culture.
You are talking about the dynamics of teacher leadership that
occur in school culture and the different variables that effect
the perceptions of what it is to be a teacher leader.
One variable is the school administration. When it serves
the purposes of the administration, teachers are asked to
mentor, plan, and implement programs. We are expected to cooperate.
Also, as teachers we are in a giving profession. So we enable.
We want to support the team.
Motivation to be a leader is another variable. For example,
I was recently asked to mentor a "professional development
team" (a new program at some county schools) on action
research. In most cases the team was selected by the principal
on an involuntary basis. The superintendent wanted these positions
to exist. The principals created them and the teachers followed.
Several teachers were resistant to learning about action research,
unmotivated due to their involuntary status. Yet learning
about action research is a positive step in professional development.
Why weren't they all volunteering to participate? Sometimes
leadership roles are foisted upon the teacher with or without
the teacher's consent. Why does this happen? Is it a historically
acceptable procedure? Are many teachers not willing to rise
up to meet leadership challenges unless forced to? Yet leadership
is needed to implement administrative policy. Where are the
leaders going to come from? What is the nature of administrative
policy vs. teacher leadership?
Teacher workload is another variable. I think teacher leadership
is viewed at times as above and beyond our professional responsibilities
rather than part of our job. Why? Because our job is so demanding
as it is. For some teachers, the classroom is all they can
handle.
Personal values about being a teacher leader are another variable.
When a teacher is self-motivated in the school community,
this can be perceived as a benefit or a threat by administrators
and other teachers. If I look good for being an NBCT or writing
a grant, why does that mean they look bad? Are professional
growth and student learning the true goals of the administration
and faculty community? Unfortunately, I think, at times, status
quo, power, and jealousy come into play. An example of above
and beyond performance by one teacher may become the expectation
for all in the future. I especially see this with response
to NBCT status. No one wants more expectations or responsibilities
because teachers believe their plate is full enough. So the
teacher leader may be subtly ostracized by other teachers.
What can teacher leadership look like in the future? Can leadership
be fostered and supported without forced participation and
colleague resentment? How can we change school culture to
promote future teacher leaders?
Mark Rosenkrantz,
Miami-Dade County,FL
4/10/05
|
|
I am not clear what things teachers would
be doing that are "not in the contract". I think
it is important as teacher leaders to uphold the contract.
For instance as a credentialed librarian I am a teacher and
have the exact same contract as any other teacher in my district.
However, some administrators are not "clear on concept"
and thought that school librarians did not "need"
a prep or a duty free lunch period. This issue went thru a
grievance process to be resolved. As co-chair of the local
school library association, I tell all school librarians that
it is essential that they follow the contract. I don't think
that administrators value martyrs. I like the quote from the
governor of NC, that teacher working conditions are student
learning conditions.
Kay Hones
San Francisco, CA
4/10/05
|
|
You are addressing
how teacher leaders inform the perceptions of policy makers
about the teaching environment. Many times policy makers make
decisions based on little research, such as feedback from
the teachers or the contract, and more on administrative needs.
When a teacher communicates and is heard it can make changes.
Unfortunately you had to go through a formal grievance process
to get planning time and duty free lunch. A contract is supposed
to protect our rights but it is only a piece of paper until
it is enforced. Many times it is a teacher leader who takes
the initiative to have contracts enforced. Sometimes getting
contract agreements enforced requires leadership. There exists
a warrior role in being a teacher leader vs. the martyr role.
Mark Rosenkrantz
Miami-Dade County, FL
4/10/05 |
|
Greetings to all,
I'm only going to respond to "What circumstances hinder
our abilities to become leaders?". I need to ponder the
other questions.
I have seen [and continue to be astonished] at the administrators
in many schools becoming inferior [for lack of a better word],
of teachers who are leaders. What eventually happens is the
administrator tries "to look at things fairly" so
they can "give everyone a chance to experience"
responsibility. They rarely call on their teacher leaders
to perform leadership type of tasks. I often wonder if the
administrators really understand the role of a leader, especially
in reference to teachers.
If I was an administrator I would love to have teacher leaders
in my school. My confidence in them would extend to knowing
their abilities would not supercede my vision, but support
it. Those teachers would become my committee leaders and representatives
of the grade levels. Therefore, they would have an active
role in planning meaningful professional development, and
in some cases present the information.
I continue to ponder the question.
Cynthia Brawner, NBCT
Chicago
4/20/05
|
|
I’m responding to the part of Mark’s question
that asks “What circumstances allow this [teacher leadership]
to happen?” For me, it was an insightful administrator who
recognized potential I didn’t realize I had. I am fortunate
to have worked with her for the last fifteen years and have
watched her nudge other teachers into leadership roles also.
She has a rare gift for matching people to positions/tasks/responsibilities.
Then she says something like, “Have you ever considered .
. . ?” “I think you would do very well with . . .” She provides
the opportunities and then supports her fledging leaders until
they develop enough self-confidence to soar on their own.
In addition to her strengths as a Maximizer, she is not afraid
to share power and authority. As I read Cynthia’s response,
the description of someone who hinders/prevents teacher leadership
is the exact opposite of the principal I’ve worked with.
Gail Ritchie
Fairfax County, VA
4/21/05
|
|
Thank
you, Erin, for that great insight. Definitely food for thought
for me as I (as a newer teacher) begin to take on more leadership
roles.
I
have seen many great teachers rise up to take the lead, while
others sit back and do not. It is the free-rider dilemma:
there is no incentive to get involved and lead when you will
benefit from the leadership of others. It takes a special
person with a passion for change and perhaps a desire for
recognition to make that extra effort and take on those extra
roles.
It is
a problem in our profession that we need to solve. I believe
that if more teachers were involved we would see more informed
and positive changes because our voices would be behind that
change. If teachers are ok with the status quo, then there
should be no complaining. But if we desire a specific style
of reform yet do nothing about it, we have ourselves to blame
for the misdirected efforts of ill-informed leaders.
Brett
Piersma
Santa Barbara, CA
4/21/05
|
|
From my
experience, a major influence on teacher leadership is the
structure & daily programming of the school day and the
priorities of the administrative leadership based on school
needs.
Some
schools encourage leadership, others have sent clear messages
in action, that it is not welcome, despite claiming it is
in theory. Good intentions are simply not enough.
When school
structure doesn't invite, encourage, and specifically ask
for teachers’ opinions and ideas on major decisions, it discourages
leadership. When it does not allow for a regular, explicit,
avenue in which teachers can express their ideas on the current
issues or decisions to be made, it discourages leadership.
And when roles of Assistant Principals are not clear or they
are not involved in communicating back what the teachers they
supervise believe and want to the Principal, or they are not
given the time to make this part of their job, it discourages
teacher leadership. Having these opportunities to regularly
and clearly communicate are essential to any school that wants
to create teacher leaders. Without them, teachers will have
little choice and little motivation to be involved in major
decisions that effect curriculum and will be discouraged that
they won’t be listened to. This creates a more isolated teaching
staff and less community of professional growth.
Schools
that build teacher leaders build in time every week for all
teachers to meet together to update as a group on whole school
events and issues. This builds community and opportunity to
question, comment, and understand. It empowers. Calendars
of staff development plans & meeting times are posted
for the year and are flexible to teacher input. Other weekly
times to meet with grade teams as well as bimonthly more extended
meetings times are set aside to truly address student needs,
individually, and for larger decisions to be made among team
members, that are respected & supported by the administrators.
3 hour weekly content team meeting times are structured, documented,
and shared on paper with others in the school. The grade &
content team meetings have their own leaders, not the principal,
and the principal supports decisions made in these meetings,
and is encouraged to be part of these decisions, but does
not veto a team's consensus. The secretaries in the school
support the teachers in their mission to effectively empower
students and the principal works & hires with that mission.
The administrators, principal included, helps kids on a daily
basis to work out social/emotional problems & conflicts
with the purpose of getting them back into the classroom &
capable to learn. This sends a clear message to students that
teachers and what they are doing is valued and kids need to
be in classrooms for their 'own good.' Most of the effective
teaching & pedagogy discussions are driven & developed
by teachers and by their needs and interests. It is clear
how to initiate creating these staff development plans and
plans are implemented when teachers agree . The principal
is involved & but does not necessarily lead in this process,
or maybe simply not lead overtly. Teachers have to believe
they are listened to & respected. The principal, in my
opinion, has a larger mission to simply get kids in our classrooms
& emotionally capable of participating in learning. This
priority, in schools I've taught in, urban, low-income---is
most important, assuming effective & successful teachers
can then lead the development & growth in effective pedagogy
for all teachers.
I wonder
what you all think.
Jennifer
Davoli
New York City
4/23/05 |
|
Early in my teaching career I was called into
the principal's office. When I arrived I found myself facing
two members of a local Kiwanis Club who were looking for someone
willing to start and advise a Key Club. I had already been
teaching mathematics for seven years and found that it wasn't
giving me enough. This looked to be a perfect solution.
25 years later I'm still at it. We run 30 events a year plus
local and international exchanges. Key Club changed my life
and the lives of the students it touched.
I bring this up because my involvement was not self-generated.
The catalyst was the principal. I don't understand why all
principals don't sit down individually with each member of
their staff (especially newer members) and ask them what is
their passion. It is the principal who must create an environment
that allows teachers to empower themselves. It is the principal
as the educational leader who should be handing teachers the
ball and saying, "Let's see what you can do."
We are all capable of being leaders. What some of us lack
is the opportunity.
Mark Grashow
Brooklyn, NY
4/23/05
|
|
I would like to jump in and second what Gail,
Jennifer, and Mark have said already about teacher leadership
and the role of the principal.
Like Mark and Gail, I too have a principal whom I credit with
"pushing" me beyond my classroom walls into a teacher
leadership role. She asked me in my fourth year of teaching
to write a grant. I thought she was crazy, but because I respected
her so much, I said to myself, "Wow, if Rowena thinks
that I am capable enough to do this, then I must be."
She not only asked me to write the grant, but she provided
me with the support I needed (resources, time, and money)
to be successful. The following year she asked me to be Health
Coordinator and a Master Teacher. I still continue to seek
her guidance 15 years later. I would definitely agree that
there are some gifted administrators that know how to identify
and guide teachers into leadership roles.
Having said that I would like to add that just because a teacher
is placed in or assumes a leadership role does not necessarily
mean that they are seen as teacher leaders. To me, teacher
leadership means that you are respected by your peers. In
our district, we have Literacy and Math coaches assigned to
each school. The role of the coaches are considered teacher
leaders, but if you ask teachers at a school where there is
an ineffective coach, would they identify that coach as a
leader? Principals may open the doors for us, but as teacher
leaders, it is our responsibility to live up to the "job"
of being a leader.
My own professional development as a teacher leader, like
Mark, was not self-generated initially. Although I have known
some teachers that self-initiate their own teacher leadership
roles early on in the profession, I would say many of us don't
start out our careers thinking about leadership roles outside
of the classroom. In my career, I had "teacher-leader
mentors" that were not in administrative roles, but classroom
teachers. Early on in my career, a teacher leader at my school
suggested I present at a local conference she was presenting
at. I was terrified, thanked her and told her I wasn't ready.
Instead she invited me to attend her workshop. By watching
her, I learned how to lead an active, teacher-centered, well-organized,
effective session. Classroom teacher leaders were the ones
that provided my name to a state teacher leadership forum.
I feel it is essential that part of our role as teacher leaders
is to recognize, invite, support, and mentor teachers so that
they become teacher leaders themselves. There is no greater
satisfaction for me, as a teacher leader, than to watch another
teacher I have mentored become a leader him/herself. Pass
it forward.
A final note, I think some teacher leaders just emerge naturally.
They don't need a title or role to play, they just go about
being who they are and doing their jobs. They are respected
by their peers and lead by example, rather than by authority.
I can name those teachers at every school I have worked at.
Does that make sense to anybody else?
Jane Fung
Los Angeles, CA
4/24/05
|
|
Jane said:
"...there are some gifted administrators that know how
to identify and guide teachers into leadership roles."
Carolyn agreed:
I have experienced a principal like this. He was one of my
earliest leadership role models. He encouraged everyone to
care about our kids and our school and its reputation. He
listened to our input as he steered the direction of the school
and so we all knew that our voices mattered. I saw mediocre
teachers blossom under his leadership. I learned from him
to look for what someone was doing well and build from this
strength to help them improve overall. He surrounded less
experienced or less capable teachers with strong mentors and
provided time and avenues for these mentorships to be effective.
He created a number of unique programs which afforded teachers
in the school to take on leadership roles. If I heard that
he had returned from retirement to be a principal again, I
would have my name on a transfer request by the end of that
day. To work with an administrator who believed in and supported
teachers' professional development at all levels was truly
a privilege.
Jane also said:
"Principals may open the doors for us, but as teacher
leaders, it is our responsibility to live up to the 'job'
of being a leader."
Carolyn added:
How true this is. And one of the toughest aspects of "living
up to the job" is engendering acceptance and cooperation
from our colleagues. I often hear teachers who aspire to lead
complain about the chilly responses they receive within their
own schools. While we know that it is human nature to resist
change, it is our responsibility as leaders to examine ourselves
and reflect on our approach when we encounter staunch opposition.
If we are truly honest with ourselves, we may have to admit
that the responses we received were of our own making. I have
seen too many "leaders" whose attitude is what turns
others off. I think this sometimes occurs because we are trained
to teach and many of us have never had any formal training
in leadership. What are the right attitudes and what skills
do we need to be effective leaders? How are we supposed to
develop these? Until recently there have been few venues to
provide such training. "Leaders" were usually identified
because they were effective in the classroom which did not
necessarily translate into the ability to lead other colleagues.
This is an exciting time because I believe this is changing.
The largely untapped potential of teacher leadership as a
vehicle to overall educational improvement has been discovered
and gradually it is being developed.
Jane offered:
"I feel it is essential that part of our role as teacher
leaders is to recognize, invite, support, and mentor teachers
so that they become teacher leaders themselves."
Carolyn expanded:
You have hit it on the head, Jane. We cannot be "selfish"
in our leadership, always wanting to be the one who gets every
leadership position or opportunity. Sometimes leading means
encouraging someone else to be in the limelight. We must sometimes
be "the wind beneath the wings" of others. We must
always remember to keep students' best interests as our guiding
principle, and that means that more teachers taking leadership
roles is good.
Carolyn Guthrie
Miami-Dade County, FL
4/24/05
|
|
Dear Mark
and Tim,
I have thought about the comments both you and Tim have made.
I have volunteered to hold many positions within the organizations
I join, whether professional or recreational. However, I have
begun more and more to realize that some volunteer positions
are actually jobs that are not being labeled as such because
it would mean creating a position and funding them.
So
I wonder how much of teacher leadership (my definition-the
ability to have a voice in school policy and then take the
responsibility for that voice), is actually unpaid work?
If other
teachers see it that way it would explain why there is less
excitement about leadership.
I think
often times, leaders and leadership are not rewarded by the
outcomes that were envisioned at the time a task is taken
on. A history of unanticipated consequences stop potential
leaders. They see that the leader is asked to do more and
it requires a greater commitment than expected.
Thanks for leading such a thoughtful discussion,
Lucia St. Denis
New York City
4/25/05
|
|