Listserv Archives

 


A Teacher Leadership Conversation

Dear TNLI MetLife Fellows:

Believe it or not, April is right around the corner! As is our usual process, we are providing you in advance with the national listserv reading for the month of April to be hosted by the Miami TNLI affiliate, and moderated by Miami TNLI MetLife Fellow Mark Rosenkrantz.

Specifically, the topic during the month of April is Teacher Leadership. Since this topic is indeed so broad and important (and our namesake!) and since Miami wants to ensure that we have the most informed and engaging professional discussion possible this month’s reading is actually a CHOICE of one, two, or more of a whole series of article links on the subject. Please find these links below and we look forward to a lively discussion led by Mark and the crew from Miami-Dade County!

APRIL Miami-Dade County

Moderator: MetLife Fellow Mark Rosenkrantz

A national, collective reading in jigsaw-format from a series of articles on the topic of Teacher Leadership. Specifically, in order to provide for the greatest depth and breadth of conversation on this broad topic, TNLI Fellows will want to choose one, two, or more articles of greatest interest from the total list provided below to read and refer to re: this discussion on Teacher Leadership.

http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/results/res4-04rich.cfm
http://www.westedorg/onlinepubs/rd-02-03.pdf
http://annenberginstitute.org/images/InstructionalCoaching.pdf
http://www.teacherleaders.org/misc/reneemoore.pdf
http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/donaldson253.pdf
http://www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/LordMiller.doc

Ellen and Peter
National HQ
3/29/05

Greetings. My name is Mark Rosenkrantz. I am this month's moderator for the discussion on "Teacher Leadership". I am a NBCT Elementary Art Teacher in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Teaching for seven years, I have involved myself in activities over this period that, in retrospect, required teacher leadership skills. I placed myself in the role of a teacher leader by leading group workshops, mentoring NBCT candidates and beginning teachers, and initiating new programs at my school. Just like many of you. Yet I pursued these activities in an uncritical way in regards to what "teacher leader" really means for me and for my profession. As I selected these articles from the TNLI reading list I felt the literature was defining a set of skills, identifying ways for teachers to acquire those skills, and revealing the role of the
"teacher leader" in today's educational community.

I had never really reflected on my own "teacher leader" skill set.

What skills do I have that supported my leadership abilities?
When was I effective?
When was I not effective and why?
If I need help in improving my leadership skills, where do I go? Who do I talk too?

At times I feel my identification in the role of "teacher leader" was not something I sought out, but a perception imposed on me by my colleagues based on my activities.

How and why did this come about?
Does the social structure of professional teacher relationships, with each other, and school administrators, create a need for "leaders" and "followers" ?

I feel I switch from leader to follower based on the professional situation. I am not always confident in the leadership role outside of my classroom. Moderating this discussion is a perfect example. Unfamiliar with the use of this group site, I sought out help from my colleagues. I used to feel that seeking out support was not part of the leadership role. Now I feel that it is precisely through that search that I make new collaborative contacts and strengthen my expertise.
Maybe we are all hidden leaders who need venues, such as this site, to practice our skills.

Do our educational communities provide us with opportunities for leadership?
Are we supported or undermined when we act as leaders in our schools?

Along with many of you, I am new to this discussion about teacher leadership. I hope you find the articles (see below) and my questions stimulating. By sharing our experience, and our questions, maybe we can begin to come to terms with this topic.

Mark Rosenkrantz
Miami-Dade County, FL
4/5/05

I think that we typically find ourselves in the un-official position of teacher leader. Many times this is because we see a problem exist and step up to take a role in finding a solution. I know for myself that this comes about when other staff are not doing the job they
should do and it is having a negative effect on my classroom and my students.

I do feel lucky, though, because I have a principal who seeks out teachers to take the lead on projects and ideas. This is one of her goals and she is successful at it. My only concern is for those teachers who find themselves in schools where the building leaders are not keen on the idea of a teacher being a leader - or worse yet, the other faculty/staff is not okay with it either. I know that if a teacher in my school volunteers to do something that isn't required by the contract, a select few other teachers get upset because they feel
like they are looked at negatively if they don't.

I'd be interested to hear others' thoughts on finding this balance on being a teacher leader - how do we lead without the resentment from others? And, to tie in last month's onversation, do unions and the contracts foster this kind of leadership?

Tim Fredrick
New York City
4/10/05

Thank you for your thoughtful response. I have also observed the situations you have described. I feel it is a reflection of school culture.
You are talking about the dynamics of teacher leadership that occur in school culture and the different variables that effect the perceptions of what it is to be a teacher leader.

One variable is the school administration. When it serves the purposes of the administration, teachers are asked to mentor, plan, and implement programs. We are expected to cooperate. Also, as teachers we are in a giving profession. So we enable. We want to support the team.

Motivation to be a leader is another variable. For example, I was recently asked to mentor a "professional development team" (a new program at some county schools) on action research. In most cases the team was selected by the principal on an involuntary basis. The superintendent wanted these positions to exist. The principals created them and the teachers followed. Several teachers were resistant to learning about action research, unmotivated due to their involuntary status. Yet learning about action research is a positive step in professional development. Why weren't they all volunteering to participate? Sometimes leadership roles are foisted upon the teacher with or without the teacher's consent. Why does this happen? Is it a historically acceptable procedure? Are many teachers not willing to rise up to meet leadership challenges unless forced to? Yet leadership is needed to implement administrative policy. Where are the leaders going to come from? What is the nature of administrative policy vs. teacher leadership?

Teacher workload is another variable. I think teacher leadership is viewed at times as above and beyond our professional responsibilities rather than part of our job. Why? Because our job is so demanding as it is. For some teachers, the classroom is all they can handle.

Personal values about being a teacher leader are another variable. When a teacher is self-motivated in the school community, this can be perceived as a benefit or a threat by administrators and other teachers. If I look good for being an NBCT or writing a grant, why does that mean they look bad? Are professional growth and student learning the true goals of the administration and faculty community? Unfortunately, I think, at times, status quo, power, and jealousy come into play. An example of above and beyond performance by one teacher may become the expectation for all in the future. I especially see this with response to NBCT status. No one wants more expectations or responsibilities because teachers believe their plate is full enough. So the teacher leader may be subtly ostracized by other teachers.

What can teacher leadership look like in the future? Can leadership be fostered and supported without forced participation and colleague resentment? How can we change school culture to promote future teacher leaders?

Mark Rosenkrantz,
Miami-Dade County,FL
4/10/05

I am not clear what things teachers would be doing that are "not in the contract". I think it is important as teacher leaders to uphold the contract. For instance as a credentialed librarian I am a teacher and have the exact same contract as any other teacher in my district. However, some administrators are not "clear on concept" and thought that school librarians did not "need" a prep or a duty free lunch period. This issue went thru a grievance process to be resolved. As co-chair of the local school library association, I tell all school librarians that it is essential that they follow the contract. I don't think that administrators value martyrs. I like the quote from the governor of NC, that teacher working conditions are student learning conditions.


Kay Hones
San Francisco, CA
4/10/05

You are addressing how teacher leaders inform the perceptions of policy makers about the teaching environment. Many times policy makers make decisions based on little research, such as feedback from the teachers or the contract, and more on administrative needs. When a teacher communicates and is heard it can make changes. Unfortunately you had to go through a formal grievance process to get planning time and duty free lunch. A contract is supposed to protect our rights but it is only a piece of paper until it is enforced. Many times it is a teacher leader who takes the initiative to have contracts enforced. Sometimes getting contract agreements enforced requires leadership. There exists a warrior role in being a teacher leader vs. the martyr role.

Mark Rosenkrantz
Miami-Dade County, FL
4/10/05

Greetings to all,

I'm only going to respond to "What circumstances hinder our abilities to become leaders?". I need to ponder the other questions.

I have seen [and continue to be astonished] at the administrators in many schools becoming inferior [for lack of a better word], of teachers who are leaders. What eventually happens is the administrator tries "to look at things fairly" so they can "give everyone a chance to experience" responsibility. They rarely call on their teacher leaders to perform leadership type of tasks. I often wonder if the administrators really understand the role of a leader, especially in reference to teachers.

If I was an administrator I would love to have teacher leaders in my school. My confidence in them would extend to knowing their abilities would not supercede my vision, but support it. Those teachers would become my committee leaders and representatives of the grade levels. Therefore, they would have an active role in planning meaningful professional development, and in some cases present the information.

I continue to ponder the question.

Cynthia Brawner, NBCT
Chicago
4/20/05

I’m responding to the part of Mark’s question that asks “What circumstances allow this [teacher leadership] to happen?” For me, it was an insightful administrator who recognized potential I didn’t realize I had. I am fortunate to have worked with her for the last fifteen years and have watched her nudge other teachers into leadership roles also. She has a rare gift for matching people to positions/tasks/responsibilities. Then she says something like, “Have you ever considered . . . ?” “I think you would do very well with . . .” She provides the opportunities and then supports her fledging leaders until they develop enough self-confidence to soar on their own. In addition to her strengths as a Maximizer, she is not afraid to share power and authority. As I read Cynthia’s response, the description of someone who hinders/prevents teacher leadership is the exact opposite of the principal I’ve worked with.


Gail Ritchie
Fairfax County, VA
4/21/05

Thank you, Erin, for that great insight. Definitely food for thought for me as I (as a newer teacher) begin to take on more leadership roles.

I have seen many great teachers rise up to take the lead, while others sit back and do not. It is the free-rider dilemma: there is no incentive to get involved and lead when you will benefit from the leadership of others. It takes a special person with a passion for change and perhaps a desire for recognition to make that extra effort and take on those extra roles.

It is a problem in our profession that we need to solve. I believe that if more teachers were involved we would see more informed and positive changes because our voices would be behind that change. If teachers are ok with the status quo, then there should be no complaining. But if we desire a specific style of reform yet do nothing about it, we have ourselves to blame for the misdirected efforts of ill-informed leaders.

Brett Piersma
Santa Barbara, CA
4/21/05

From my experience, a major influence on teacher leadership is the structure & daily programming of the school day and the priorities of the administrative leadership based on school needs.

Some schools encourage leadership, others have sent clear messages in action, that it is not welcome, despite claiming it is in theory. Good intentions are simply not enough.

When school structure doesn't invite, encourage, and specifically ask for teachers’ opinions and ideas on major decisions, it discourages leadership. When it does not allow for a regular, explicit, avenue in which teachers can express their ideas on the current issues or decisions to be made, it discourages leadership. And when roles of Assistant Principals are not clear or they are not involved in communicating back what the teachers they supervise believe and want to the Principal, or they are not given the time to make this part of their job, it discourages teacher leadership. Having these opportunities to regularly and clearly communicate are essential to any school that wants to create teacher leaders. Without them, teachers will have little choice and little motivation to be involved in major decisions that effect curriculum and will be discouraged that they won’t be listened to. This creates a more isolated teaching staff and less community of professional growth.

Schools that build teacher leaders build in time every week for all teachers to meet together to update as a group on whole school events and issues. This builds community and opportunity to question, comment, and understand. It empowers. Calendars of staff development plans & meeting times are posted for the year and are flexible to teacher input. Other weekly times to meet with grade teams as well as bimonthly more extended meetings times are set aside to truly address student needs, individually, and for larger decisions to be made among team members, that are respected & supported by the administrators. 3 hour weekly content team meeting times are structured, documented, and shared on paper with others in the school. The grade & content team meetings have their own leaders, not the principal, and the principal supports decisions made in these meetings, and is encouraged to be part of these decisions, but does not veto a team's consensus. The secretaries in the school support the teachers in their mission to effectively empower students and the principal works & hires with that mission. The administrators, principal included, helps kids on a daily basis to work out social/emotional problems & conflicts with the purpose of getting them back into the classroom & capable to learn. This sends a clear message to students that teachers and what they are doing is valued and kids need to be in classrooms for their 'own good.' Most of the effective teaching & pedagogy discussions are driven & developed by teachers and by their needs and interests. It is clear how to initiate creating these staff development plans and plans are implemented when teachers agree . The principal is involved & but does not necessarily lead in this process, or maybe simply not lead overtly. Teachers have to believe they are listened to & respected. The principal, in my opinion, has a larger mission to simply get kids in our classrooms & emotionally capable of participating in learning. This priority, in schools I've taught in, urban, low-income---is most important, assuming effective & successful teachers can then lead the development & growth in effective pedagogy for all teachers.

I wonder what you all think.

Jennifer Davoli
New York City
4/23/05

Early in my teaching career I was called into the principal's office. When I arrived I found myself facing two members of a local Kiwanis Club who were looking for someone willing to start and advise a Key Club. I had already been teaching mathematics for seven years and found that it wasn't giving me enough. This looked to be a perfect solution.

25 years later I'm still at it. We run 30 events a year plus local and international exchanges. Key Club changed my life and the lives of the students it touched.

I bring this up because my involvement was not self-generated. The catalyst was the principal. I don't understand why all principals don't sit down individually with each member of their staff (especially newer members) and ask them what is their passion. It is the principal who must create an environment that allows teachers to empower themselves. It is the principal as the educational leader who should be handing teachers the ball and saying, "Let's see what you can do."

We are all capable of being leaders. What some of us lack is the opportunity.

Mark Grashow
Brooklyn, NY
4/23/05

I would like to jump in and second what Gail, Jennifer, and Mark have said already about teacher leadership and the role of the principal.

Like Mark and Gail, I too have a principal whom I credit with "pushing" me beyond my classroom walls into a teacher leadership role. She asked me in my fourth year of teaching to write a grant. I thought she was crazy, but because I respected her so much, I said to myself, "Wow, if Rowena thinks that I am capable enough to do this, then I must be." She not only asked me to write the grant, but she provided me with the support I needed (resources, time, and money) to be successful. The following year she asked me to be Health Coordinator and a Master Teacher. I still continue to seek her guidance 15 years later. I would definitely agree that there are some gifted administrators that know how to identify and guide teachers into leadership roles.

Having said that I would like to add that just because a teacher is placed in or assumes a leadership role does not necessarily mean that they are seen as teacher leaders. To me, teacher leadership means that you are respected by your peers. In our district, we have Literacy and Math coaches assigned to each school. The role of the coaches are considered teacher leaders, but if you ask teachers at a school where there is an ineffective coach, would they identify that coach as a leader? Principals may open the doors for us, but as teacher leaders, it is our responsibility to live up to the "job" of being a leader.

My own professional development as a teacher leader, like Mark, was not self-generated initially. Although I have known some teachers that self-initiate their own teacher leadership roles early on in the profession, I would say many of us don't start out our careers thinking about leadership roles outside of the classroom. In my career, I had "teacher-leader mentors" that were not in administrative roles, but classroom teachers. Early on in my career, a teacher leader at my school suggested I present at a local conference she was presenting at. I was terrified, thanked her and told her I wasn't ready. Instead she invited me to attend her workshop. By watching her, I learned how to lead an active, teacher-centered, well-organized, effective session. Classroom teacher leaders were the ones that provided my name to a state teacher leadership forum.

I feel it is essential that part of our role as teacher leaders is to recognize, invite, support, and mentor teachers so that they become teacher leaders themselves. There is no greater satisfaction for me, as a teacher leader, than to watch another teacher I have mentored become a leader him/herself. Pass it forward.

A final note, I think some teacher leaders just emerge naturally. They don't need a title or role to play, they just go about being who they are and doing their jobs. They are respected by their peers and lead by example, rather than by authority. I can name those teachers at every school I have worked at. Does that make sense to anybody else?

Jane Fung
Los Angeles, CA
4/24/05

Jane said:

"...there are some gifted administrators that know how to identify and guide teachers into leadership roles."

Carolyn agreed:

I have experienced a principal like this. He was one of my earliest leadership role models. He encouraged everyone to care about our kids and our school and its reputation. He listened to our input as he steered the direction of the school and so we all knew that our voices mattered. I saw mediocre teachers blossom under his leadership. I learned from him to look for what someone was doing well and build from this strength to help them improve overall. He surrounded less experienced or less capable teachers with strong mentors and provided time and avenues for these mentorships to be effective. He created a number of unique programs which afforded teachers in the school to take on leadership roles. If I heard that he had returned from retirement to be a principal again, I would have my name on a transfer request by the end of that day. To work with an administrator who believed in and supported teachers' professional development at all levels was truly a privilege.

Jane also said:

"Principals may open the doors for us, but as teacher leaders, it is our responsibility to live up to the 'job' of being a leader."

Carolyn added:

How true this is. And one of the toughest aspects of "living up to the job" is engendering acceptance and cooperation from our colleagues. I often hear teachers who aspire to lead complain about the chilly responses they receive within their own schools. While we know that it is human nature to resist change, it is our responsibility as leaders to examine ourselves and reflect on our approach when we encounter staunch opposition. If we are truly honest with ourselves, we may have to admit that the responses we received were of our own making. I have seen too many "leaders" whose attitude is what turns others off. I think this sometimes occurs because we are trained to teach and many of us have never had any formal training in leadership. What are the right attitudes and what skills do we need to be effective leaders? How are we supposed to develop these? Until recently there have been few venues to provide such training. "Leaders" were usually identified because they were effective in the classroom which did not necessarily translate into the ability to lead other colleagues. This is an exciting time because I believe this is changing. The largely untapped potential of teacher leadership as a vehicle to overall educational improvement has been discovered and gradually it is being developed.

Jane offered:


"I feel it is essential that part of our role as teacher leaders is to recognize, invite, support, and mentor teachers so that they become teacher leaders themselves."

Carolyn expanded:

You have hit it on the head, Jane. We cannot be "selfish" in our leadership, always wanting to be the one who gets every leadership position or opportunity. Sometimes leading means encouraging someone else to be in the limelight. We must sometimes be "the wind beneath the wings" of others. We must always remember to keep students' best interests as our guiding principle, and that means that more teachers taking leadership roles is good.

Carolyn Guthrie
Miami-Dade County, FL
4/24/05

Dear Mark and Tim,
I have thought about the comments both you and Tim have made. I have volunteered to hold many positions within the organizations I join, whether professional or recreational. However, I have begun more and more to realize that some volunteer positions are actually jobs that are not being labeled as such because it would mean creating a position and funding them.

So I wonder how much of teacher leadership (my definition-the ability to have a voice in school policy and then take the responsibility for that voice), is actually unpaid work?

If other teachers see it that way it would explain why there is less excitement about leadership.

I think often times, leaders and leadership are not rewarded by the outcomes that were envisioned at the time a task is taken on. A history of unanticipated consequences stop potential leaders. They see that the leader is asked to do more and it requires a greater commitment than expected.

Thanks for leading such a thoughtful discussion,

Lucia St. Denis
New York City
4/25/05

 

About this Site About this SiteSearch the Teachnet Site Email Teachnet Go To homepage