Listserv Archives

 

Discussion of
It's Time to Tell the Kids: If You Don't Do Well in High School, You Won't Do Well in College (or on the Job),
by James E. Rosenbaum

Dear TNLI MetLife Fellows:

Believe it or not, December is right around the corner (!)---so, as promised, we are sending you the listserv reading information for the month of December, moderated by Los Angeles TNLI Fellow Lara Goldstone. Please see specifics on the reading—including its digital link—directly below:

DECEMBER—Los Angeles.

Moderator: MetLife Fellow Lara Goldstone

It's Time To Tell the Kids: If You Don't Do Well in High School, You Won't Do Well in College (or on the Job), by James E. Rosenbaum. AFT American Educator publication, spring 2004 issue. Available online—see link below: http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/spring2004/tellthekids.html

In the meantime, throughout November, please continue to add your thoughts and insights to the exciting NCLB discussion led by NYC TNLI Fellow Kara Imm.

Thanks so much,

Ellen and Peter
National HQ
11/19/04
Hello, educators! I invite you all to bridge the weeks between Thanksgiving and winter holiday merriment with some food for thought about helping more students complete college. Our article for this month's discussion is entitled "It's Time to Tel the Kids: If You Don't Do Well in High School, You Won't Do Well in College (or on the Job)" from the Spring 2004 edition of American Educator.

The article's author, James Rosenbaum, argues that too many students are entering college but not earning degrees because they are unprepared for the amount and level of college coursework. He proposes a 6 part solution, focused mostly on high school counselors and teachers.

Let's start by discussing two questions:

1. Do you agree with Rosenbaum's argument that failure to exert academic effort in high school is one of the primary causes of students dropping out of college?

2. What can educators at the K-8 level do to help assure that our students will go on to make good post-secondary choices and achieve their post-secondary goals? Jill Manning, the LA TNLI fellow who recommended this article, is an elementary school math coach and former kindergarten teacher, and she suggested that this work begins in the primary grades. What are educators you know doing to help prepare students for college?

I look forward to hearing everyone's thoughts!

Lara Goldstone
Los Angeles
12/1/04

I agree with Rosenbaum's argument that lack of student effort in high school is the primary cause of students dropping out of college. I also think that this problem stems from a general lack of effort put forth by all students beginning even as young as third and fourth grades. I am an elementary school teacher and have taught students from K-6. I have been teaching for 25 years. Over those years it seems that students who are in grades K, 1, and 2 are willing to put forth whatever effort it takes to please their teachers. After grade 2 it seems that the effort level decreases as students grade level increases. Students even in the third grade appear to recognize that there is no need to put forth effort to accomplish success. They see athletes playing or sometimes not playing their favorite sports and being paid richly for this minimal effort. They see CEOs of major companies earning high dollars for what appears to be minimal effort. They even see those who are on Federal Assistance sit at home and bring in money, which to them seems like quite a lot, with very little effort. This is a learned response and students are falling into this mode earlier and earlier. Our society has cultivated a crop of young people who don't have role models that are hard working and who struggle to succeed.

Instead, we have role models who work little and are extremely successful. As an elementary school teacher I find it quite frustrating to try to instill in my students the need and desire to work hard to accomplish a goal. The support that is needed from both home and society is lacking. While this needs to be taught and internalized it is becoming increasingly difficult to do either as a classroom teacher without the necessary support from the home and from society as a whole. Unfortunately, students in elementary school do not recognize college as something that is in their immediate realm of understanding. Being very literal and wanting immediate reinforcement, it is difficult for them to understand that the effort they put forth today directly correlates to the effort they will put forth in the future. This concept is very difficult to teach at such an early age, yet it needs to be taught and continues to be a focus in my school. We stress the importance of effort in everything that our students do. While we still struggle with students who put forth minimal effort we are continuing to reinforce students who do exert the needed effort and to provide as many positive role models as possible for those who do not put forth the necessary amount of effort. I hope this is helpful. I look forward to hearing additional thoughts on this subject.

Denise Snyder
Millsboro, DE
12/5/04

Hello Everyone!

<<Do you agree with Rosenbaum's argument that failure to exert academic effort in high school is one of the primary causes of students dropping out of college?>>

I think there is much more to Rosenbaum's Misconception 1 than meets the eye. Although I do agree that lack of effort in high school will affect college success, I think it goes deeper than just a lack of effort. What about the quality of instruction a student receives in high school? We all know that the quality of instruction often depends on the teacher a student has. What about the student who is motivated and works extremely hard to get a good grade in high school and receives that A or B in class, but the A or B does not mean the same as that A or B across town at another high school? The student is putting effort, but the standards and expectations across school may not be the same, so will that effort really help predict college success?

I think back to my own high school experience. I think about 2 different English classes. Both counted towards high school credit for graduation. I got an A in one class and a B in the other. The class where I received the A was easy, and the teacher expected very little compared to the class where I received a B. Knowing what I know now, the A class did not prepare me at all for what I would encountered later in college. The B class was more "college prep." So what I am trying to say is it is not always how much of an effort or grade (success) a student has in high school, but rather the quality of the high school experience that influences college success.

All high schools are not created the same. Do all students have access to high quality schools in the first place? If not, what can we do to ensure that they do? Not an easy question to answer when we know that there are so many inequalities in our schools today: materials, qualified teachers, resources, AP courses offered, etc.

Happy Sunday!

Jane Fung
Los Angeles
12/5/04

I’d like to list my reasons for students failing to live up to expectation in high school and ultimately struggling in college. I offer this viewpoint after having taught high school in Brooklyn for 35 years. During those years, in addition to teaching math, I advised community service club, coached the swimming team, taught the GED program, advised the Rainbow Alliance and was the union rep.

1. For many students, high school is a miserable and degrading experience. Making an effort is the least of their problems. They hate school because of social ineptitude; they are made to feel stupid, they are too short, too fat, they are bullied, have language problems, issues with their own sexuality, they are lonely and are overwhelmed by the overcrowding. Who would want to spend up to 6 hours a day in a place that is a continuing source of humiliation?
2. No sense of future. Students fail to connect their high school experience to a career. They want to be doctors and cannot multiple. They don’t read and can’t write and they want to be lawyers. How many of them are taken to a lawyer’s office and told what skills would be required of them?
3. They have no staff member who knows them. His or her guidance counselor has a 400-student caseload. The college advisor is responsible for 300 college applications. If they happen to be relatively quiet and introspective, they will move through their academic classes relatively unnoticed.
4. They belong to no team or club and are never made to feel part of an organized group. They have no sense of family or belonging. They never get a chance to feel important and valued for who they are.
5. Their friends have no interest in school and undermine their success. They talk them into cutting classes. They put no value on studying. They hang out after school and homework becomes and afterthought.
6. They have teachers that have no business being in front of a classroom. As a former union rep, I’ve encountered dozens of teachers that fail to prepare properly. Some are mean and vindictive. They demean students and disrespect them as people. Some have no discipline skills and go through the motions of teacher while the class is in chaos.
7. Students work after school. Some work to support their families; others work to buy clothes and CDs. They work long hours that leave no time for homework or a full night’s sleep. For a few extra dollars in their pocket, they fail classes.
8. No parental supervision. Out of a typical class of 30 students perhaps 6 or 7 will have had dinner with a parent the night before. The parent does not supervise their children’s schoolwork. They have no idea who their friends are or how they spend their time. The parents have no connection to the high school and never set foot in the building. On a good night perhaps 20% of the parents show up for open school and these are usually the ones who children are academically successful. The parents of most high school students generally have no idea if their children are sexually active, taking drugs or suffering from depression. They just don’t talk to each other.

Before we accuse a student of not making an effort we need to take a closer look at the support services we offer that child. Most students are capable of doing better, but it requires someone knowing that student and extending a hand.

Mark Grashow
NYC
12/5/04

I haven't read the article that prompted this discussion. However, I'll jump in with both feet:

I agree that failure to exert academic effort in HS is one of the causes of drop out in college. I'm not sure it is one of the primary causes. I think motivation is by far the greatest factor.

I'm a little distressed at this whole discussion. Where is the desire to learn? Where is the love of learning for its own sake? This discussion seems focused on what we can do to make students effective at jumping the hoops of education, but nothing on how to help students love learning for its own sake.

I'm not sure I want to help students to 'achieve their post-secondary goals' because often, their 'goals' are merely what they think society deems best for them, and not a goal from their heart. I want to help my students to discover a passion. Something they love so much, they will work hard to create a product that reflects their passion - and not do it 'for the grade' or 'because it'll be good on their resume.'

I am more concerned that my students have success in life. I realize that achievement in college is one of the manifestations of that, but it isn't the only one.

Margaret Nye
San Francisco

Yes Margaret, I agree with you that achievement in college is not the only thing that we should measure student success by. You asked:

<<Where is the desire to learn? Where is the love of learning for its own sake?>>

I would like to know how to instill that passion for learning in every student. Is it possible for us to do that as teachers or is it something that students need to develop for themselves? It would make sense that if students had the desire to learn, they would likely put more effort in whatever they do, including doing well in school.

As an early primary teacher (K-2), I am lucky to see that desire and excitement in the eyes of my students when they learn something new or discover they have accomplished something. Mark, what happens between when they enter school excited and believing they can do anything to feeling miserable and helpless? Having worked with high school students for so long, and knowing them well; what are some things we can do to not only ensure that they don't get lost in the system, but to keep that thirst for knowledge alive?

Jane Fung
Los Angeles
December 6, 2004

The question "Where is the desire to learn?" immediately gave me the thought "We don't live in a society that values learning." We are a society that values success over effort. We adore successful people but do not examine what it took for them to get there. We study those who have done wonderful things, but never study the process that got them there. To bridge last month's conversation, we are a society that calls a school a success who can produce some good test results, while ignore
the fact that the test was made easier or kids who have more trouble were kept out of the school.

Perhaps our role as educators to counteract this would be to focus on effort - both in our curriculum and in our grading. This can be done in all grades. It always bothers me to see students' evaluations boiled down to a few tests, quizzes, etc. Too often do we have students who are trying their best but still failing for whatever reason? Perhaps it is time to take the focus off the end result (the grade) and put it on the learning and the effort put forth.

It is too simple to blame bad schools or a bad school system when we see little effort from our students. Even in the best of schools, with the safest classrooms and the most imaginative teachers, students need to put forth effort to succeed. I don't blame the students - they simply react to what they are given. The society, home, and school are at fault for creating a situation where students don't see the connection between effort and success.

Tim Fredrick
New York City
December 6, 2004

Thank you to everyone who has participated in this discussion so far. I have a few more questions:

1. Let's review. Jane's argument that sometimes students exert a great deal of effort and meet all of the expectations laid out for them by their teachers-- but those expectations are too low to prepare even a straight A student for college coursework. Is the standards movement a positive step towards getting rid of this problem? If not, what kinds of policies should we as educators are advocating making sure that students are given adequate rigor in their coursework?
2. Several fellows have written about the need for students to feel a passion for life, for learning and for school. What policies should we be advocating to help this-- or, as Jane asks, is this the job of educators alone?

Lara Goldstone
Los Angeles
December 7, 2004

Hello everyone. Would just like to add my voice to this discussion and support (or second) Mark Grashow's observations. As a fellow Brooklynite, I can attest to the realities for many of our urban students & their experiences in school (starting in elementary school, unfortunately!).... In particular their feeling of 'no future ahead', the quality of many of their often 'burnt-out' teachers as well as their economic/social realities at home & on the street produce students who place 'school' on the back burner, if anywhere meaningful at all. A 'love of learning' may indeed exist for many of these students but it is not evidenced in the classrooms of our schools. Hopefully, the new small schools that are being created can help ameliorate a few of these situations where the size of the school contributes to a student feeling 'anonymous'. But, that is, not going to solve the overall problems & issues.....

David Silberberg
New York City
December 7, 2004

The problem we are grappling with here is the depth of explanation, what one might call the order of explanation.

What does that mean? One could say, for example, that the reason why we are experiencing global warming is because there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, or that the ozone layer is depleted. True? Most scientists would agree. But is that explanation deep enough? Don't we need to know why there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, or why the ozone layer is depleted?

The statement that students do not do well in college because of a lack of effort in high school may indeed have an element of truth in it, although even it strikes me as rather incomplete [Americans attend post-secondary education at a much higher rate than any other advanced industrial society, so clearly one factor is that our net is a lot wider than other nation's nets], but one then must ask why they are not working as hard as they might be in high school. If we don't ask that question, then we can simply infer what every causal explanation we would like to why students are not working hard in high school. They may not be working hard because American high school students are lazy. Or it may be that American schools just don't push their students to work hard [there is a new book by the American political scientist Michael Barone which suggests that American education is one of the few 'soft' institutions in American society, shielding students from the 'hard' realities of competition.]

Or, and here comes one of the possibilities I find more interesting, it may be that American high school students don't work hard when they don't see an efficacy in hard work, when they don't see a connection between hard work and effort and the outcomes of that effort. The late anthropologist John Ogbu offers an explanation of this type for the negative peer culture toward academic achievement among some African-American students -- the notion that high achieving African-American students are "acting white." If you believe that the deck is stacked against you, that racism will prevent you from having the life you want regardless of how well you achieve [and although such a belief is clearly less well-founded then in the past, it is not completely without merit], then why should you exert yourself to work harder? That is not a complete explanation for the "acting white" phenomenon, but it certainly is a major part of it.

So the key question may be not "do American students fail in college because they don't work hard enough in high school?" but "why is it that American high school students don't work as hard as they might?"

Leo Casey
New York City
December 7, 2004

Why don't high school students work harder? We have heard about all of the social problems before, and I am sure they are valid. However, I think we have created a system that fosters low effort.

When I first began teaching high school a student taking a full load would accumulate 28 credits. But only 18 1/2 credits were required to graduate. With more than a year's worth of credits to spare, why not fail a course or two. It didn't matter. Even now, there is still a substantial cushion of credits between the possible and the required. The safety net is so strong it is more like safety canvass. There are night school and correspondence courses as well as summer school for students to make up for courses they have not passed during the year.

We have also developed such a concern for a grade point average, that students may avoid a challenging course in fear of losing class standing. We have grouped our students heterogeneously so that the brightest students don't have to put out much effort to be the best in the class, as teachers cannot speed up presentation of material or incorporate more challenging material.

An earlier responder commented on the fact that testing eliminates any possibility of grading on effort. The final result must be the product, not the effort. A problem with the tests is that there is no incentive for students to do well. It does not affect their grades, it only reflects on their teachers and schools. How many adults would do their best on a week of tests if told it didn't count. Our children are not crazy or stupid.

Pardon my rambling, but this is a topic that has concerned me for years. Habits learned in high school carry over into college and the freshmen have no idea what to expect.

Helen Gieske
State of Delaware
December 7, 2004

I agree with Leo's call to take the discussion to a deeper level and I will follow his lead with "suggestions for further reading."

Ogbu's work was extremely eye-opening to me when I read it for the first time. An additional component in his theory that Leo didn't mention is his comparison of what he calls a "dual frame of reference," and how it explains disparities in minority achievement.

He argues that "voluntary minorities" (European and Asian immigrants) came to America voluntarily and they are able to compare the inequality in our opportunity structure to the opportunities that they had back home. For many, this perspective helps them to see their current status in a positive light and leads to hard work and a belief in the achievement ideology. "Involuntary minorities" (African-Americans, Native Americans and Native Hawaiians) on the other hand, have no such frame of reference since they did not come here in search of a better life. Their frame of reference for interpreting injustice is to compare their limited opportunity to the opportunities available to the middle class or affluent white members of our society. This frame of reference leads many involuntary minorities to correctly conclude (as Leo stated) that "the deck is stacked against you,” and leads many to reject the achievement ideology or belief that hard work will get you anywhere.
(Ogbu, J, 1998. “A Voluntary and Involuntary Minorities: A Cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education.” Anthropology and Education Quarterly 29:2)

Claude Steele and Joshua Aronson would also add that "stereotype threat" creates a hostile climate which leads to underperformance from minorities in "domains" in which society expects them to underperform. They found that when participants took tests in which the groups that they belonged to (blacks taking the SAT or girls taking Math tests) were stereotyped to be academically inferior to other groups, and they identified themselves as belonging to that group, they underperformed similar students who did not identify themselves.

There is another interesting case study in Ain't No Makin' It" by Jay Macleod in which he studies black teenagers in a housing project who have a much stronger work ethic and more developed achievement ideology than the Italian teens who have lived in the same projects for generations. He attributes this to the effects of the Civil Rights movement and the black families' recent northward migration. Yet they end up with similar attainment to the whites when Macleod visits them eight years later. What we are left to conclude is that discrimination and social class reproduction end up trumping effort and ideology.

Richard Rothstein's new book Class and Schools adds yet another layer to the discussion when he concludes that schools really can't make too drastic a dent on the achievement gap without accompanying aggressive social and economic reform (income redistribution, housing policy, health policy, etc.).

(Some of the Rothstein and Aronson material is available in the latest Educational Leadership Achievement Gap issue.)

Lastly, I believe that parent involvement in urban schools is crucial and teachers in these settings will not succeed in forming partnerships with families if they blame parents who are uninvolved without understanding that all of the above psycho-social forces at times, bear on parents even more heavily than they do on their children. When we recognize that all of this explains not only why some of our students are reluctant learners and some of our parents are reluctant to enter schools, hopefully we will move toward more responsive, culturally sensitive teaching practices and help our students to fully engage in their academic lives and their lives in general.

Sorry to post an entire mini-lit review but I've been doing a lot of achievement gap reading and a lot of this work was very groundbreaking to me (and I know that all of you have lots of spare time for professional reading).

Lamson Lam
New York City
December 7, 2004
Just a quick thought in response to Leo's question: 'Why is it that American student do not work as hard as they might?'

I was watching the news this past weekend, I forget the exact focus and channel, but I think it was actually about preparing students for college (it was not about NCLB) and a point was brought up that in other countries were they place a high cultural value on education, school is often seen as the student's job, their only job. It was said that here, in America, we put more of an emphasis on being "well-rounded". Did anyone else catch this? We all hear this message about being a well-rounded student. Do students in other countries take school much more seriously because of the cultural value placed on their role in their education, and, therefore, put more effort into their studies?

I also read Ogbu's research in grad school. Leo and Lamson bring up some very interesting points to ponder as we look more deeply at the complex reasons why, as Leo put fourth, American student's do not work harder than they might.

Nicole Nadeau
New York
December 7, 2004

Until politicians get in touch with reality, we will continue to be told that high test scores are what it's all about. What they fail to understand is that some students, the students you speak of, will never be motivated to achieve by more pressure on the schools, teachers, and them. There are real needs out there - desperate needs. What kinds of policy advocacy can occur to begin to make a difference for our desperate students?

Carol Gregor
Santa Barbara
December 10, 2004

I teach at an alternative school near Chinatown in New York City for students aged 17-21. Our student population has two major demographics: Chinese “voluntary” immigrants who have already graduated from high school in China, but need a US HS diploma for college and who arrived in the country too late to graduate HS by the time they turn 18 (79% of the school), and a combination of African-American and Hispanic students who have failed out of other public high schools (21%). For each group, our school is a “last chance” situation. All of my students are considered “high risk” by the DOE, and their statistics are grouped with the students from Riker’s Island Academy (a juvenile prison school) and other alternative, vocational public schools. All of my students suffer from feeling about as dispassionate about being in school as possible.
The endurance and motivation of my (voluntary) Chinese-immigrant students is markedly higher, but the “passion of learning” is not. Like their younger counterparts and as Lamson supported with research, my students have a more available, concrete connection between hard work and success, but most of my particular students do not love what they are doing by a long shot. Faced with long hours of full time jobs in addition to school, the rote responsibility of trudging through algebra AGAIN just to get into college, and the daunting task of assimilation, these students often just stop doing it--they drop out. The motivation of so many of my American-born students was beaten out of them a long time before they came to us. Mostly by bad teachers and overcrowded, violent classrooms.

Before I became a teacher, I was a documentary film producer, and in addition to my English Lit classes, I teach Documentary Video Production. My doc students have seen some of the films I’ve worked on, one recently in a real movie theater, while in the process of creating their own. I have explained to them that documentary film is a destitute industry, hard work, and will never, no matter how many trips to Sundance, yield the cash money that a rap, NBA, or engineering career will. But still, I watch these students work HARD for real results. They explore contemporary “art,” they are gathering relevant skills in researching, interviewing, camera operation, and editing. They learn to question sources; they learn to construct an argument, to back it up with hard evidence, to deconstruct the codes and messages around them. They watch and force the collision of five academic subjects in the same place at the same time. They also create a finished product: A real movie that they built, all by themselves, from the very beginning to the very end.
We have no reason to expect students to be fired up and passionate about learning at any level if we’re only teaching them math equations and five paragraph essays. We do have to teach these things—that is a fact. As teachers, we often have so much working against us when we try to do more creative things in the classroom and our students are confronted with a million reasons to leave school no matter what their background. Because of these things, I believe we have to keep fighting bad policy and publicly recognize real barriers (racial and otherwise), which is why I am part of TNLI. But in the meantime, as my video students write practice "Task II" ELA Regents essays to consolidate their research data, I also don’t believe, at least yet, that our hands are too tied to facilitate enjoyable, real connections between effort—the kind we all WANT to spend, and real success. To me, that’s the passion of learning.
Leslie Jirsa
New York City
December 11, 2004

Thanks to everyone for chiming in between sipping of egg nog and finishing up the last few pre-vacation days of school (or are some of you lucky teachers on vacation already?)

We have heard many fellows speak to the importance of engaging and rigorous instruction and curriculum as a means to helping our students feel the desire to learn and the motivation to pursue higher education.

I am going to turn the conversation now to a different topic raised by this article: exit exams. Rosenbaum faults high school exit exams for sending students the message that they are prepared for college when they are not: "But in many states the high school exit exams were designed to assess minimum competence. So every year many students pass a high school exit exam, but then do poorly on a college placement exam and end up in remedial courses." (pgs. 8-9). His solution is for high school students to be given more rigorous diagnostic assessments of their skills.

What is your take on exit exams? Do you agree with Rosenbaum's prescription? What policies should we as educators be promoting in this area?

I am looking forward to reading a few more responses before falling into a holiday food coma. :)

Lara Goldstone
Los Angeles
December 18, 2004
Greetings to all.

I found these comments on the OpEd page of the Wilmington News Journal, and then located it online at the address below. I think it sheds some insight into the serious problem we have getting our young men interested in academics. As an aside, perhaps somewhat related, a couple of weeks ago there was a series on NPR centered around the reduced roles men are now playing in our society. With women taking over many top leadership roles formerly reserved for men, what are the men doing? Perhaps this explains a reason rather than an effect.

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34784-2004Dec4.html

Helen Gieske
State of Delaware
December 26, 2004

December is almost over, and thus concludes our December list-serve discussion. The comments around this article have helped us all to think more clearly and purposefully about how each us plays a role in helping students form their attitude towards learning, studying, and planning for a life after age 18-- whether that includes college or not. We as educators strive to make our instruction meaningful and motivating to each of our students, and as policymakers we need to advocate for better counseling at the high school level. I am grateful for all of your contributions and look forward to our January discussion. Until then, may everyone have a wonderful New Year's and may 2005 get off to a joyous start!

Lara Goldstone
Los Angeles
December 28, 2004

 

 

About this Site About this SiteSearch the Teachnet Site Email Teachnet Go To homepage