|
Discussion of
It's Time to Tell the Kids: If You Don't Do Well in High School, You
Won't Do Well in College (or on the Job), by James E.
Rosenbaum
Dear
TNLI MetLife Fellows:
Believe it or not, December is right around the corner (!)---so,
as promised, we are sending you the listserv reading information
for the month of December, moderated by Los Angeles TNLI Fellow
Lara Goldstone. Please see specifics on the reading—including
its digital link—directly below:
DECEMBER—Los Angeles.
Moderator: MetLife Fellow Lara Goldstone
It's Time To Tell the Kids: If You Don't Do Well
in High School, You Won't Do Well in College (or on the Job),
by James E. Rosenbaum. AFT American Educator publication, spring
2004 issue. Available online—see link below: http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/spring2004/tellthekids.html
In the meantime, throughout November, please continue to add
your thoughts and insights to the exciting NCLB discussion led
by NYC TNLI Fellow Kara Imm.
Thanks so much,
Ellen and Peter
National HQ
11/19/04 |
| Hello,
educators! I invite you all to bridge the weeks between Thanksgiving
and winter holiday merriment with some food for thought about
helping more students complete college. Our article for this
month's discussion is entitled "It's Time to Tel the Kids:
If You Don't Do Well in High School, You Won't Do Well in College
(or on the Job)" from the Spring 2004 edition of American
Educator.
The article's author, James Rosenbaum, argues
that too many students are entering college but not earning
degrees because they are unprepared for the amount and level
of college coursework. He proposes a 6 part solution, focused
mostly on high school counselors and teachers.
Let's start by discussing two questions:
1. Do you agree with Rosenbaum's argument
that failure to exert academic effort in high school is one
of the primary causes of students dropping out of college?
2. What can educators at the K-8 level do
to help assure that our students will go on to make good post-secondary
choices and achieve their post-secondary goals? Jill Manning,
the LA TNLI fellow who recommended this article, is an elementary
school math coach and former kindergarten teacher, and she
suggested that this work begins in the primary grades. What
are educators you know doing to help prepare students for
college?
I look forward to hearing everyone's thoughts!
Lara Goldstone
Los Angeles
12/1/04
|
| I
agree with Rosenbaum's argument that lack of student effort
in high school is the primary cause of students dropping out
of college. I also think that this problem stems from a general
lack of effort put forth by all students beginning even as young
as third and fourth grades. I am an elementary school teacher
and have taught students from K-6. I have been teaching for
25 years. Over those years it seems that students who are in
grades K, 1, and 2 are willing to put forth whatever effort
it takes to please their teachers. After grade 2 it seems that
the effort level decreases as students grade level increases.
Students even in the third grade appear to recognize that there
is no need to put forth effort to accomplish success. They see
athletes playing or sometimes not playing their favorite sports
and being paid richly for this minimal effort. They see CEOs
of major companies earning high dollars for what appears to
be minimal effort. They even see those who are on Federal Assistance
sit at home and bring in money, which to them seems like quite
a lot, with very little effort. This is a learned response and
students are falling into this mode earlier and earlier. Our
society has cultivated a crop of young people who don't have
role models that are hard working and who struggle to succeed.
Instead, we have role models who work little
and are extremely successful. As an elementary school teacher
I find it quite frustrating to try to instill in my students
the need and desire to work hard to accomplish a goal. The
support that is needed from both home and society is lacking.
While this needs to be taught and internalized it is becoming
increasingly difficult to do either as a classroom teacher
without the necessary support from the home and from society
as a whole. Unfortunately, students in elementary school do
not recognize college as something that is in their immediate
realm of understanding. Being very literal and wanting immediate
reinforcement, it is difficult for them to understand that
the effort they put forth today directly correlates to the
effort they will put forth in the future. This concept is
very difficult to teach at such an early age, yet it needs
to be taught and continues to be a focus in my school. We
stress the importance of effort in everything that our students
do. While we still struggle with students who put forth minimal
effort we are continuing to reinforce students who do exert
the needed effort and to provide as many positive role models
as possible for those who do not put forth the necessary amount
of effort. I hope this is helpful. I look forward to hearing
additional thoughts on this subject.
Denise Snyder
Millsboro, DE
12/5/04
|
Hello
Everyone!
<<Do
you agree with Rosenbaum's argument that failure to exert
academic effort in high school is one of the primary causes
of students dropping out of college?>>
I think
there is much more to Rosenbaum's Misconception 1 than meets
the eye. Although I do agree that lack of effort in high school
will affect college success, I think it goes deeper than just
a lack of effort. What about the quality of instruction a
student receives in high school? We all know that the quality
of instruction often depends on the teacher a student has.
What about the student who is motivated and works extremely
hard to get a good grade in high school and receives that
A or B in class, but the A or B does not mean the same as
that A or B across town at another high school? The student
is putting effort, but the standards and expectations across
school may not be the same, so will that effort really help
predict college success?
I think
back to my own high school experience. I think about 2 different
English classes. Both counted towards high school credit for
graduation. I got an A in one class and a B in the other.
The class where I received the A was easy, and the teacher
expected very little compared to the class where I received
a B. Knowing what I know now, the A class did not prepare
me at all for what I would encountered later in college. The
B class was more "college prep." So what I am trying
to say is it is not always how much of an effort or grade
(success) a student has in high school, but rather the quality
of the high school experience that influences college success.
All high
schools are not created the same. Do all students have access
to high quality schools in the first place? If not, what can
we do to ensure that they do? Not an easy question to answer
when we know that there are so many inequalities in our schools
today: materials, qualified teachers, resources, AP courses
offered, etc.
Happy
Sunday!
Jane Fung
Los Angeles
12/5/04 |
I’d
like to list my reasons for students failing to live up to expectation
in high school and ultimately struggling in college. I offer
this viewpoint after having taught high school in Brooklyn for
35 years. During those years, in addition to teaching math,
I advised community service club, coached the swimming team,
taught the GED program, advised the Rainbow Alliance and was
the union rep.
1. For many students, high school is a miserable and degrading
experience. Making an effort is the least of their problems.
They hate school because of social ineptitude; they are made
to feel stupid, they are too short, too fat, they are bullied,
have language problems, issues with their own sexuality, they
are lonely and are overwhelmed by the overcrowding. Who would
want to spend up to 6 hours a day in a place that is a continuing
source of humiliation?
2. No sense of future. Students fail to connect their high school
experience to a career. They want to be doctors and cannot multiple.
They don’t read and can’t write and they want to be lawyers.
How many of them are taken to a lawyer’s office and told what
skills would be required of them?
3. They have no staff member who knows them. His or her guidance
counselor has a 400-student caseload. The college advisor is
responsible for 300 college applications. If they happen to
be relatively quiet and introspective, they will move through
their academic classes relatively unnoticed.
4. They belong to no team or club and are never made to feel
part of an organized group. They have no sense of family or
belonging. They never get a chance to feel important and valued
for who they are.
5. Their friends have no interest in school and undermine their
success. They talk them into cutting classes. They put no value
on studying. They hang out after school and homework becomes
and afterthought.
6. They have teachers that have no business being in front of
a classroom. As a former union rep, I’ve encountered dozens
of teachers that fail to prepare properly. Some are mean and
vindictive. They demean students and disrespect them as people.
Some have no discipline skills and go through the motions of
teacher while the class is in chaos.
7. Students work after school. Some work to support their families;
others work to buy clothes and CDs. They work long hours that
leave no time for homework or a full night’s sleep. For a few
extra dollars in their pocket, they fail classes.
8. No parental supervision. Out of a typical class of 30 students
perhaps 6 or 7 will have had dinner with a parent the night
before. The parent does not supervise their children’s schoolwork.
They have no idea who their friends are or how they spend their
time. The parents have no connection to the high school and
never set foot in the building. On a good night perhaps 20%
of the parents show up for open school and these are usually
the ones who children are academically successful. The parents
of most high school students generally have no idea if their
children are sexually active, taking drugs or suffering from
depression. They just don’t talk to each other.
Before we accuse a student of not making an effort we need to
take a closer look at the support services we offer that child.
Most students are capable of doing better, but it requires someone
knowing that student and extending a hand.
Mark Grashow
NYC
12/5/04
|
| I
haven't read the article that prompted this discussion. However,
I'll jump in with both feet:
I agree that failure to exert academic effort
in HS is one of the causes of drop out in college. I'm not
sure it is one of the primary causes. I think motivation is
by far the greatest factor.
I'm a little distressed at this whole discussion.
Where is the desire to learn? Where is the love of learning
for its own sake? This discussion seems focused on what we
can do to make students effective at jumping the hoops of
education, but nothing on how to help students love learning
for its own sake.
I'm not sure I want to help students to 'achieve
their post-secondary goals' because often, their 'goals' are
merely what they think society deems best for them, and not
a goal from their heart. I want to help my students to discover
a passion. Something they love so much, they will work hard
to create a product that reflects their passion - and not
do it 'for the grade' or 'because it'll be good on their resume.'
I am more concerned that my students have
success in life. I realize that achievement in college is
one of the manifestations of that, but it isn't the only one.
Margaret Nye
San Francisco
|
| Yes
Margaret, I agree with you that achievement in college is not
the only thing that we should measure student success by. You
asked:
<<Where is the desire to learn? Where
is the love of learning for its own sake?>>
I would like to know how to instill that passion
for learning in every student. Is it possible for us to do
that as teachers or is it something that students need to
develop for themselves? It would make sense that if students
had the desire to learn, they would likely put more effort
in whatever they do, including doing well in school.
As an early primary teacher (K-2), I am lucky
to see that desire and excitement in the eyes of my students
when they learn something new or discover they have accomplished
something. Mark, what happens between when they enter school
excited and believing they can do anything to feeling miserable
and helpless? Having worked with high school students for
so long, and knowing them well; what are some things we can
do to not only ensure that they don't get lost in the system,
but to keep that thirst for knowledge alive?
Jane Fung
Los Angeles
December 6, 2004
|
The
question "Where is the desire to learn?" immediately
gave me the thought "We don't live in a society that values
learning." We are a society that values success over effort.
We adore successful people but do not examine what it took for
them to get there. We study those who have done wonderful things,
but never study the process that got them there. To bridge last
month's conversation, we are a society that calls a school a
success who can produce some good test results, while ignore
the fact that the test was made easier or kids who have more
trouble were kept out of the school.
Perhaps our role as educators to counteract
this would be to focus on effort - both in our curriculum
and in our grading. This can be done in all grades. It always
bothers me to see students' evaluations boiled down to a few
tests, quizzes, etc. Too often do we have students who are
trying their best but still failing for whatever reason? Perhaps
it is time to take the focus off the end result (the grade)
and put it on the learning and the effort put forth.
It is too simple to blame bad schools or a
bad school system when we see little effort from our students.
Even in the best of schools, with the safest classrooms and
the most imaginative teachers, students need to put forth
effort to succeed. I don't blame the students - they simply
react to what they are given. The society, home, and school
are at fault for creating a situation where students don't
see the connection between effort and success.
Tim Fredrick
New York City
December 6, 2004
|
Thank
you to everyone who has participated in this discussion so far.
I have a few more questions:
1. Let's review. Jane's argument that sometimes students exert
a great deal of effort and meet all of the expectations laid
out for them by their teachers-- but those expectations are
too low to prepare even a straight A student for college coursework.
Is the standards movement a positive step towards getting rid
of this problem? If not, what kinds of policies should we as
educators are advocating making sure that students are given
adequate rigor in their coursework?
2. Several fellows have written about the need for students
to feel a passion for life, for learning and for school. What
policies should we be advocating to help this-- or, as Jane
asks, is this the job of educators alone?
Lara Goldstone
Los Angeles
December 7, 2004
|
| Hello
everyone. Would just like to add my voice to this discussion
and support (or second) Mark Grashow's observations. As a fellow
Brooklynite, I can attest to the realities for many of our urban
students & their experiences in school (starting in elementary
school, unfortunately!).... In particular their feeling of 'no
future ahead', the quality of many of their often 'burnt-out'
teachers as well as their economic/social realities at home
& on the street produce students who place 'school' on the
back burner, if anywhere meaningful at all. A 'love of learning'
may indeed exist for many of these students but it is not evidenced
in the classrooms of our schools. Hopefully, the new small schools
that are being created can help ameliorate a few of these situations
where the size of the school contributes to a student feeling
'anonymous'. But, that is, not going to solve the overall problems
& issues.....
David Silberberg
New York City
December 7, 2004
|
| The
problem we are grappling with here is the depth of explanation,
what one might call the order of explanation.
What does that mean? One could say, for example,
that the reason why we are experiencing global warming is
because there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, or
that the ozone layer is depleted. True? Most scientists would
agree. But is that explanation deep enough? Don't we need
to know why there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere,
or why the ozone layer is depleted?
The statement that students do not do well
in college because of a lack of effort in high school may
indeed have an element of truth in it, although even it strikes
me as rather incomplete [Americans attend post-secondary education
at a much higher rate than any other advanced industrial society,
so clearly one factor is that our net is a lot wider than
other nation's nets], but one then must ask why they are not
working as hard as they might be in high school. If we don't
ask that question, then we can simply infer what every causal
explanation we would like to why students are not working
hard in high school. They may not be working hard because
American high school students are lazy. Or it may be that
American schools just don't push their students to work hard
[there is a new book by the American political scientist Michael
Barone which suggests that American education is one of the
few 'soft' institutions in American society, shielding students
from the 'hard' realities of competition.]
Or, and here comes one of the possibilities
I find more interesting, it may be that American high school
students don't work hard when they don't see an efficacy in
hard work, when they don't see a connection between hard work
and effort and the outcomes of that effort. The late anthropologist
John Ogbu offers an explanation of this type for the negative
peer culture toward academic achievement among some African-American
students -- the notion that high achieving African-American
students are "acting white." If you believe that
the deck is stacked against you, that racism will prevent
you from having the life you want regardless of how well you
achieve [and although such a belief is clearly less well-founded
then in the past, it is not completely without merit], then
why should you exert yourself to work harder? That is not
a complete explanation for the "acting white" phenomenon,
but it certainly is a major part of it.
So the key question may be not "do American
students fail in college because they don't work hard enough
in high school?" but "why is it that American high
school students don't work as hard as they might?"
Leo Casey
New York City
December 7, 2004
|
Why
don't high school students work harder? We have heard about
all of the social problems before, and I am sure they are valid.
However, I think we have created a system that fosters low effort.
When I first began teaching high school a student taking a full
load would accumulate 28 credits. But only 18 1/2 credits were
required to graduate. With more than a year's worth of credits
to spare, why not fail a course or two. It didn't matter. Even
now, there is still a substantial cushion of credits between
the possible and the required. The safety net is so strong it
is more like safety canvass. There are night school and correspondence
courses as well as summer school for students to make up for
courses they have not passed during the year.
We have also developed such a concern for a grade point average,
that students may avoid a challenging course in fear of losing
class standing. We have grouped our students heterogeneously
so that the brightest students don't have to put out much effort
to be the best in the class, as teachers cannot speed up presentation
of material or incorporate more challenging material.
An earlier responder commented on the fact that testing eliminates
any possibility of grading on effort. The final result must
be the product, not the effort. A problem with the tests is
that there is no incentive for students to do well. It does
not affect their grades, it only reflects on their teachers
and schools. How many adults would do their best on a week of
tests if told it didn't count. Our children are not crazy or
stupid.
Pardon my rambling, but this is a topic that has concerned me
for years. Habits learned in high school carry over into college
and the freshmen have no idea what to expect.
Helen Gieske
State of Delaware
December 7, 2004
|
I
agree with Leo's call to take the discussion to a deeper level
and I will follow his lead with "suggestions for further
reading."
Ogbu's work was extremely eye-opening to me when I read it for
the first time. An additional component in his theory that Leo
didn't mention is his comparison of what he calls a "dual
frame of reference," and how it explains disparities in
minority achievement.
He argues that "voluntary minorities" (European and
Asian immigrants) came to America voluntarily and they are able
to compare the inequality in our opportunity structure to the
opportunities that they had back home. For many, this perspective
helps them to see their current status in a positive light and
leads to hard work and a belief in the achievement ideology.
"Involuntary minorities" (African-Americans, Native
Americans and Native Hawaiians) on the other hand, have no such
frame of reference since they did not come here in search of
a better life. Their frame of reference for interpreting injustice
is to compare their limited opportunity to the opportunities
available to the middle class or affluent white members of our
society. This frame of reference leads many involuntary minorities
to correctly conclude (as Leo stated) that "the deck is
stacked against you,” and leads many to reject the achievement
ideology or belief that hard work will get you anywhere.
(Ogbu, J, 1998. “A Voluntary and Involuntary Minorities: A Cultural-ecological
theory of school performance with some implications for education.”
Anthropology and Education Quarterly 29:2)
Claude Steele and Joshua Aronson would also add that "stereotype
threat" creates a hostile climate which leads to underperformance
from minorities in "domains" in which society expects
them to underperform. They found that when participants took
tests in which the groups that they belonged to (blacks taking
the SAT or girls taking Math tests) were stereotyped to be academically
inferior to other groups, and they identified themselves as
belonging to that group, they underperformed similar students
who did not identify themselves.
There is another interesting case study in Ain't No Makin' It"
by Jay Macleod in which he studies black teenagers in a housing
project who have a much stronger work ethic and more developed
achievement ideology than the Italian teens who have lived in
the same projects for generations. He attributes this to the
effects of the Civil Rights movement and the black families'
recent northward migration. Yet they end up with similar attainment
to the whites when Macleod visits them eight years later. What
we are left to conclude is that discrimination and social class
reproduction end up trumping effort and ideology.
Richard Rothstein's new book Class and Schools adds yet another
layer to the discussion when he concludes that schools really
can't make too drastic a dent on the achievement gap without
accompanying aggressive social and economic reform (income redistribution,
housing policy, health policy, etc.).
(Some of the Rothstein and Aronson material is available in
the latest Educational Leadership Achievement Gap issue.)
Lastly, I believe that parent involvement in urban schools is
crucial and teachers in these settings will not succeed in forming
partnerships with families if they blame parents who are uninvolved
without understanding that all of the above psycho-social forces
at times, bear on parents even more heavily than they do on
their children. When we recognize that all of this explains
not only why some of our students are reluctant learners and
some of our parents are reluctant to enter schools, hopefully
we will move toward more responsive, culturally sensitive teaching
practices and help our students to fully engage in their academic
lives and their lives in general.
Sorry to post an entire mini-lit review but I've been doing
a lot of achievement gap reading and a lot of this work was
very groundbreaking to me (and I know that all of you have lots
of spare time for professional reading).
Lamson Lam
New York City
December 7, 2004 |
| Just
a quick thought in response to Leo's question: 'Why is it that
American student do not work as hard as they might?'
I was watching the news this past weekend,
I forget the exact focus and channel, but I think it was actually
about preparing students for college (it was not about NCLB)
and a point was brought up that in other countries were they
place a high cultural value on education, school is often
seen as the student's job, their only job. It was said that
here, in America, we put more of an emphasis on being "well-rounded".
Did anyone else catch this? We all hear this message about
being a well-rounded student. Do students in other countries
take school much more seriously because of the cultural value
placed on their role in their education, and, therefore, put
more effort into their studies?
I also read Ogbu's research in grad school.
Leo and Lamson bring up some very interesting points to ponder
as we look more deeply at the complex reasons why, as Leo
put fourth, American student's do not work harder than they
might.
Nicole Nadeau
New York
December 7, 2004
|
| Until
politicians get in touch with reality, we will continue to be
told that high test scores are what it's all about. What they
fail to understand is that some students, the students you speak
of, will never be motivated to achieve by more pressure on the
schools, teachers, and them. There are real needs out there
- desperate needs. What kinds of policy advocacy can occur to
begin to make a difference for our desperate students?
Carol Gregor
Santa Barbara
December 10, 2004
|
I
teach at an alternative school near Chinatown in New York City
for students aged 17-21. Our student population has two major
demographics: Chinese “voluntary” immigrants who have already
graduated from high school in China, but need a US HS diploma
for college and who arrived in the country too late to graduate
HS by the time they turn 18 (79% of the school), and a combination
of African-American and Hispanic students who have failed out
of other public high schools (21%). For each group, our school
is a “last chance” situation. All of my students are considered
“high risk” by the DOE, and their statistics are grouped with
the students from Riker’s Island Academy (a juvenile prison
school) and other alternative, vocational public schools. All
of my students suffer from feeling about as dispassionate about
being in school as possible.
The endurance and motivation of my (voluntary) Chinese-immigrant
students is markedly higher, but the “passion of learning” is
not. Like their younger counterparts and as Lamson supported
with research, my students have a more available, concrete connection
between hard work and success, but most of my particular students
do not love what they are doing by a long shot. Faced with long
hours of full time jobs in addition to school, the rote responsibility
of trudging through algebra AGAIN just to get into college,
and the daunting task of assimilation, these students often
just stop doing it--they drop out. The motivation of so many
of my American-born students was beaten out of them a long time
before they came to us. Mostly by bad teachers and overcrowded,
violent classrooms.
Before I became a teacher, I was a documentary
film producer, and in addition to my English Lit classes,
I teach Documentary Video Production. My doc students have
seen some of the films I’ve worked on, one recently in a real
movie theater, while in the process of creating their own.
I have explained to them that documentary film is a destitute
industry, hard work, and will never, no matter how many trips
to Sundance, yield the cash money that a rap, NBA, or engineering
career will. But still, I watch these students work HARD for
real results. They explore contemporary “art,” they are gathering
relevant skills in researching, interviewing, camera operation,
and editing. They learn to question sources; they learn to
construct an argument, to back it up with hard evidence, to
deconstruct the codes and messages around them. They watch
and force the collision of five academic subjects in the same
place at the same time. They also create a finished product:
A real movie that they built, all by themselves, from the
very beginning to the very end.
We have no reason to expect students to be fired up and passionate
about learning at any level if we’re only teaching them math
equations and five paragraph essays. We do have to teach these
things—that is a fact. As teachers, we often have so much
working against us when we try to do more creative things
in the classroom and our students are confronted with a million
reasons to leave school no matter what their background. Because
of these things, I believe we have to keep fighting bad policy
and publicly recognize real barriers (racial and otherwise),
which is why I am part of TNLI. But in the meantime, as my
video students write practice "Task II" ELA Regents
essays to consolidate their research data, I also don’t believe,
at least yet, that our hands are too tied to facilitate enjoyable,
real connections between effort—the kind we all WANT to spend,
and real success. To me, that’s the passion of learning.
Leslie Jirsa
New York City
December 11, 2004
|
Thanks
to everyone for chiming in between sipping of egg nog and finishing
up the last few pre-vacation days of school (or are some of
you lucky teachers on vacation already?)
We have heard many fellows speak to the importance of engaging
and rigorous instruction and curriculum as a means to helping
our students feel the desire to learn and the motivation to
pursue higher education.
I am going to turn the conversation now to a different topic
raised by this article: exit exams. Rosenbaum faults high school
exit exams for sending students the message that they are prepared
for college when they are not: "But in many states the
high school exit exams were designed to assess minimum competence.
So every year many students pass a high school exit exam, but
then do poorly on a college placement exam and end up in remedial
courses." (pgs. 8-9). His solution is for high school students
to be given more rigorous diagnostic assessments of their skills.
What is your take on exit exams? Do you agree with Rosenbaum's
prescription? What policies should we as educators be promoting
in this area?
I am looking forward to reading a few more responses before
falling into a holiday food coma. :)
Lara Goldstone
Los Angeles
December 18, 2004 |
| Greetings
to all.
I found these comments on the OpEd page of
the Wilmington News Journal, and then located it online at
the address below. I think it sheds some insight into the
serious problem we have getting our young men interested in
academics. As an aside, perhaps somewhat related, a couple
of weeks ago there was a series on NPR centered around the
reduced roles men are now playing in our society. With women
taking over many top leadership roles formerly reserved for
men, what are the men doing? Perhaps this explains a reason
rather than an effect.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34784-2004Dec4.html
Helen Gieske
State of Delaware
December 26, 2004
|
| December
is almost over, and thus concludes our December list-serve discussion.
The comments around this article have helped us all to think
more clearly and purposefully about how each us plays a role
in helping students form their attitude towards learning, studying,
and planning for a life after age 18-- whether that includes
college or not. We as educators strive to make our instruction
meaningful and motivating to each of our students, and as policymakers
we need to advocate for better counseling at the high school
level. I am grateful for all of your contributions and look
forward to our January discussion. Until then, may everyone
have a wonderful New Year's and may 2005 get off to a joyous
start!
Lara Goldstone
Los Angeles
December 28, 2004
|
|